05 October, 2008

Raising Drug-Free Children -- some thoughts from the editor

Our September - November edition of Kindred raised a few eyebrows, specifically with regards to our special feature called 'Raising Drug-Free Kids'. While many readers wrote in to thank us for the feature, we also received a number of emails from equally unhappy readers.

I welcome the occasion when readers may not agree with an article we've published as it indicates to me that the Kindred readership is engaged, thoughtful, opinionated and passionate. The occasion also allows for a deepening to occur - for concepts to be re-examined, and new understanding to develop as a result of diverse points of view coming together...for all of us. It is because of these opportunities that we are launching a terrific new multi-platform website at the end of this year that will feature discussions, forums, blogs and community generated content. This will allow us to really engage with Kindred content, and form new ideas, support each other and generally grow together. Meanwhile, we're stuck with the limitations of our current site, and hence my blog to you today.

Basically the feature ended up igniting a rather chronic long term clash between two related yet at times different approaches to conscious parenting--Aletha Solter's Aware Parenting approach, and classic Attachment Parenting theory. Of course there are many who don't see a division in these two approaches, but there are some who do, and still others who do, but only with certain aspects. I'm not going to go into what the differences are or what the different points of view are here. You'll have to read the magazine to get a sense of the feature. But I did want to address an over-arching theme that arose for me in reading all the emails I received.

It seems to me that in the wake of losing our extended families, our natural-world support base, our traditions, our instincts, our sense of belonging and our empowerment through the disease of 'disconnection' that our culture perpetuates, we as parents cling to the only thread of sanity offered to us amidst the chaos and insanity of modern life. That thread is the hope of creating a sane and peaceful world through parenting our children consciously. As Barbara Kingsolver wrote, 'My best revenge against all the dishonesty and hatred in the world, it seems to me, will be to raise right up through the middle of it these honest and loving children.' With that hope has been created a plethora of books, tapes, dvds, lectures, workshops, support groups, coaches, magazines and classes to help support us on that journey. A journey that pits us directly at odds with modern society - its culture and its mad frenzied heartless pace.

And, as well intentioned as all these books, tapes, dvds, etc are, all they can offer us is the superficial intellectual understanding of how to parent. They cannot give to us what nature, native-culture, familial lineage, belonging and instincts would give---give right down into our bone marrow. They can only give us formulas. Just like religion or spiritual practice cannot give us God...it can only point the way. The old saying of 'the spiritual teacher is only a finger pointing to the moon---not the moon itself' can be applied here. The teachings of conscious parenting are only fingers pointing, they are not the consciousness itself. That is our job to embody.

So Attachment Parenting (AP) or Solter's Aware Parenting are just that...fingers pointing to the moon. They are formula's based on the intention to meet babies' and children's needs in an optimal manner so that they might grow up to feel loved, connected and whole. The trouble is, they can point us, but they can't make us be it. That is our job, in every moment, through every single millisecond and it will be different for every parent and every child and everything and everyone in between.

But rather than be present, we settle for a formula. Not because we're jerks or anything, but simply because it is how the insane world runs. We are taught to be disconnected and not present. So being present hasn't exactly been our default position. And the forumula might be a great formula, an evolved, humane, conscious, attached formula....but it's still a formula. So regardless if someone leans more towards classic AP theory, or towards Aware Parenting theory, or a mixture of both...there is still the risk we can respond to our children in unpresent formuliac responses...simply because a book (or magazine!) told us so. For example, many AP parents aren't comfortable just holding their children while they cry (electing to jiggle them, distract them or offer them the breast), simply because their own need is to have the child stop crying (a crying child can be very distressing for us, especially if we were unresponded to as children). Similarly, an Aware Parenting parent, can use Aletha's approach simply to stop a child from night feeds. Both are booby traps (pardon the pun), and aren't necessarily the best approach for a child in a particular moment. The anecdote for all this is being present.

So on it goes, between these two theories, there are grey areas where different experts could argue that one specific response to a baby or child is more connected or appropriate than another response. The hairs can be split ad infinitum. Meanwhile, while we spend our time splitting those hairs, we miss the ove-arching invitation: to be absolutely present with ourselves and our children. (By the way, I'm not adverse to hair-splitting, love it in fact....and will be engaging some of our 'experts' in a forum for just that purpose on this very subject on our new website...).

Formuliac thinking is also responsible for some of the upset responses we received concerning the article on drug-free kids and it's chart on control patterns. The chart was meant as a means to illustrate how some emotional control patterns might develop sometimes under some circumstances. But instead Kindred was accused of stating that babies who are jiggled or rocked become drug addicts! I must say, I do understand, however. I am no stranger to formulaic thinking.

So I thought to use this moment, when the two theories were clashing in my midst, to let go of the fingers and go straight to the moon itself....to true presence, responsiveness and empathy with our children. My friend and colleague Robin Grille suggested a conscious parenting litmus test for just this purpose. He suggests:

In any given moment with your child, ask yourself these questions:
Am I responding to my child and what he / she needs, or am I just doing this because I read it somewhere? Or am I doing this to try to heal my own childhood wounds THROUGH my child?

Of course, stay tuned to our new website, where we can be present AND split hairs! My guess is that all of us will contribute towards deeper understanding of who we are and how to continue forward on our journey to return this planet to sanity.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks Kali, that makes so much sense. I was originally disturbed by the article (probably because I feed my children to sleep and for comfort) but after processing it for a few days I realised there was a difference between feeding them when that's how they want to be comforted, and feeding them just to stop them crying. So yes, I guess its about being present and doing what is best in each individual situation rather than picking a reaction (formula) and sticking with it. Which may be harder andmoe emotionally draining but more useful and rewarding n the long run.

Kali Wendorf said...

Tell me about it! I was the queen of feeding them to stop them from crying! I just felt so disturbed about their tears. And there was all this pressure socially around how much a baby cried and how 'happy'and 'content' they were. Especially in attachment circles. So, Aletha's work made me really examine that 'formula'...but not until my kids were in primary school. Now I notice that my oldest child is frightened of feelings, and terrified of being bored (having been constantly distracted and jiggled). I can do three things with this: flog myself, flog the information about jiggling, or self-reflect and move on a bit wiser. I notice that the third option helps my son the most.

Julie said...

I have recently started to practise Aware Parenting and the great change for me has been the shift in my own emotions and my ability to be present. Previously when my children cried or were upset my mind was busy working out ways to stop the crying or raging and/or worring about what other people would think of me. Which, when you have three small children all crying or needing you at the same time is enormously stressful(I have 2 boys aged 4 and 3 and a girl aged 1)! I had reached the point a few months ago where I was starting to hit my 4 year old which devestated me. Now when my children are upset all I have to do is be there. My mind is calm and present because I am not tring to do anything but be there and allow them to express themselves. Today my 4 year was very angry and threatening to hit me, break things etc and all I did was look at him lovingly and express my empathy. Tears welded in both our eyes and I just opened my arms and we held each other and cried. I felt incredibly connected to him and knew I had met his need to release his stress and reconnect with me in a loving way.

Unknown said...

Hi Kali, I want to thank you for providing the vehicle and opportunity for this discussion to be had, as it seems so needed to help us all grow together as an aware, attached and connected parenting community. I was fortunate to have read 'the aware baby' when my son was 3 months, and it transformed our relationship. More recently I have undertaken a course with Patty Wipfler from Hand In Hand who is focussed on helping build the connection between parents and children, largely by developing listening skills. For me personally the vital component of Patty's work is in the creation of listening partnerships for parents. I think that irrespective of the styles and beliefs that parents have, what they need most to help their children, is to have somebody listen to them on a regular basis about all the challenges and restimulation that happens for them. This is what's missing with this 'disease of disconnection that our culture perpetuates'. And this is so undervalued and neglected in our society. How can we keep listening to our children with a calm and loving presence if we have a need to be listened to ourselves? It's only by clearing out our own hurts that we can keep staying connected to our children so that they can feel safe enough to clear away theirs. Best wishes and thanks, Megan

Anonymous said...

Thank you Kali. This meet my needs for more clarity around 'formuliac' responses from my extended family. Having an ecological backgroud and a passion for social ecology, I am partial to models and frameworks to help me explain and think about natural processes. I can now understand how I can be misinterpreted.

Sharon Colicchia said...

Greetings Kali & others,
You word your thoughts so well. Being an 'aware parent' myself, I totally agree with you, it is about being present. We became parents for the first time 14 months ago and for the first 6 months we practiced attachment parenting. After jiggling, distracting & feeding Jasmine each time she cried, we saw the logic in the philosophies of aware parenting and have since then practiced aware parenting. The difference & connection with Jasmine was remarkable, especially after she was able to release feelings of frustrations, overwhelmness, tensions, upsets etc.. with acceptance in our loving presence through crying. I am sincerely thankful to Aletha’s pioneering work as I am deeply grateful for the amazing connection I share with Jasmine on a daily basis, life is so rich.
Sharon Colicchia

Bob Collier said...

Hi, Kali

I've never called my parenting anything other than parenting, but I'm a big fan of Keith Gilbert's NLP: Liberating Parents.

http://www.neurolinguisticparents.com/NeuroLinguisticParenting.htm