
The article mentions that all canola is derived from genetically modified rape seed plants. However, this is not the case. Canola oil comes from a hybrid plant developed from using traditional pedigree hybrid propagation techniques (this is not genetic modification) involving black mustard, leaf mustard, and turnip rapeseed. The original rapeseed plant was high in erucic acid, which is an unpalatable fatty acid having negative health effects in high concentrations. Canola oil has been created from specially bred plants to have low concentrations of erucic acid and contains less than one percent.
With that said, much of the canola now coming from North America has been genetically modified. GM Canola has all kinds of ethical, economic and health issues separate to conventional canola due to the fact that it is GM, not because it is canola. GM canola is also about to be given the go ahead to be planted in Australia, and there is a fierce campaign operating to try and prevent this from happening.
We’d also like to point out that the article implies canola oil is used as a poison to get rid of insects (such as aphids), even though the author mentions that she drowns them using the oil. Other oils can do the same, not by poisoning insects, but by suffocating them. It's a kind of factual sleight-of-hand that undermines true research behind the subject.
We at Kindred would apply the Precautionary Principle when considering canola oil for topical or internal use. Given that a there remains wide debate about its safety, and that there are other healthier alternatives, it would be wise to exclude it from one’s lifestyle. While it is important to keep the issue of canola free of fear-mongering and fact-twisting, consumers do have a reason to use caution.
With thanks to Jane Thompson